Deb Jordan Says YOUR Free Speech is Being Used to Convict Pete Santilli for His Free Speech

pete santilli and deb jordan.jpg

IMAGE SOURCE: Deb Jordan Facebook Page

By CHERI ROBERTS for Challenging the Rhetoric

*UPDATE: Deb & Spitfire have removed the video in question as of 2/14 by 9p PDT

In a live stream broadcast on The Pete Santilii Show, filling the dead-air while Santilli is incarcerated, Spitfire — sitting in the dark dressed in a blazer with no shirt, railed against fellow podcaster Dahboo7 while simultaneously claiming everyone should get along and work together.

Maybe Spitfire needs to practice what he preaches?

But, more importantly was this …

In a call-in, Santilli co-host and live-in girlfriend, Deb Jordan apologized for being so busy, but wanted to let the listeners and fans know that their First Amendment right to free expression is hurting Santilli and being used to convict him for his alleged crimes in Burns, Oregon, at the Malheur refuge and elsewhere.

Jordan says,

I wanna tell everybody…did you know that in court they are using things that people have done against Pete, on the internet, as a tool to convict him.”

Apparently, they want your donations served with a side of silence.

If Santilli has a right under the First Amendment to say everything he has said, as Jordan and the ACLU claims, then why would she expect anyone else to give up their right to do the same, even if it is inflammatory speech against Santilli?

The irony is hypocritical, but at least she herself, for now, has stopped her own incendiary talk on the show rallying “Patriots” to the crime scene. One can only guess the change in her demeanor is because Santilli’s attorney cautioned she hasn’t been doing her man any favors.

You can hear what Deb has to say in the archive HERE. I highly suggest fast forwarding to the comment at the 35:54 mark versus try to listen to the whole show. Conversation is nearly indistinguishable over the loud and obnoxious music Spitfire chose to run in the background.

Listenership on the Santilli channel is dropping quickly without Santilli there to egg his listeners on. Currently, there seems little Spitfire or Deb can do to stop it from sinking.

–> CLICK FOR FEB. 17TH PODCAST <–

*

If you like this or other Challenging the Rhetoric articles, please share with others; follow our website, Facebook page and/or follow us @CTRNewsFeed on Twitter. Don’t forget to listen to the LIVE show every Weds. @6pm PST/9pm EST or hit up our archives. Thank you!

20 responses to “Deb Jordan Says YOUR Free Speech is Being Used to Convict Pete Santilli for His Free Speech

  1. Dear Deb, we the people are fed up with manipulation and lies. that is different than free speech, if he were honest on who he speaks for, than yes we stand behind his right to his opinion, but please do not manipulate the ignorant using deception and propaganda.

    Liked by 1 person

    • The quote in my article is the meat of what she said. It was a lot of just rambling. Spitfire had crazy music in the background and people in comments were all complaining about it. I am assuming that is why they took it down, not because they realized the ridiculousness of what she said. I am sure there will be another vid soon that will say basically the same.

      Like

  2. Pingback: TONIGHT: First, Second and Fourteenth Amendments at Play in Oregon Standoff Controversy | Challenging the Rhetoric·

  3. Good post Cheri. Those con artist ooze hypocrisy with every breath. It remind me of the video of the Santilli dirtbag screaming in the anti-militia protester’s face with a bullhorn while the poor guy was covering his ears. I’m fascinated by the rubes that give him and his girlfriend money, that they undoubtedly don’t have since full time Facebook commenting doesn’t bring in the rent.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Pingback: The Jailhouse Memoirs of a Shock Jock | Tracking the leopard Meroz·

  5. Saying things against another freelance reporter, especially when you quote some one out of context, can hurt you more then you know……before you write what you think someone thinks or why they have done something, influencially speaking, you might want to make sure it does not get back to them or hope that no one has contact with him, knowing……it will come back to haunt you…..we are very much in contact with and support of Santilli…..how ever not a big fan of yours…..and I am wondering what he will think when we tell him you said, and I quote…..”Santilli begged me to be on his show”. I have that one saved.

    Like

    • I could care less what he thinks because it is obvious, he isn’t thinking. That being said, that was an exact quote of Deb’s. Why’d they delete it? And speaking of misquoting…I didn’t say he begged me to be on his show 🙂 I DID however say he begged me to move my show too his GMN network. #Fact. BTW, I have a whole packet to mail to him hun. Feel free to save me the postage. If you actually cared about him or any of the others, you would slow your role and actually DO something to help him. I did. I contacted one of the leading First Amendment litigators and media ethics people in the country, someone who thinks Santilli COULD get off if they are basing charges on speech not actual actions. I brought that to the public. And not just any public, but one of people who were completely against him. Many have changed their minds and or feel a lil empathy. That’s how you reach out.

      Like

  6. Pingback: Is there a Sex Doll with Your Face on it? (NSFW or children) | Challenging the Rhetoric·

  7. Pingback: Sex for Sale: the Obscene Profits and the Unseen Costs of the Internet Sex Industry | Challenging the Rhetoric·

  8. Pingback: New Evidence in LaVoy Finicum Death Shoots Down Some Patriot Conspiracy Claims While Breathing Life into Others | Challenging the Rhetoric·

  9. Pingback: FBI Fuels Conspiracy Cover-Up Flames Over LaVoy Finicum Shooting | Challenging the Rhetoric·

  10. Pingback: 94 Points of Interest in Deshutes County Sheriff Incident Report Detailing Oregon Standoff Operation Resulting in Death of LaVoy Finnicum | Challenging the Rhetoric·

  11. Pingback: 94 Points of Interest in Deschutes County Sheriff Incident Report Detailing Oregon Standoff Operation Resulting in Death of LaVoy Finnicum | Challenging the Rhetoric·

  12. Pingback: The Problem with Pete Santilli | Challenging the Rhetoric·

  13. Pingback: Will Hillary Clinton be indicted? Did David Patraeus get a free-pass? Are Whistleblowers a bad thing? | Challenging the Rhetoric·

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s